注释,注释: The subject of this research is the problems of state control over media markets in the post-truth era, with an emphasis on how such control affects public perception and dissemination of information. The object of the study is based on the analysis of two case studies — the "Rat's Head or Duck's Neck" incident and the "Mathematical Genius Jiang Ping" incident. This study highlights the limitations imposed by government oversight on media diversity and pluralism in China. Applying the theory of media ownership, the theory of agenda formation, and the theory of the public sphere, the authors of the study show how state-controlled media limit the diversity of narratives, narrow the scope of public discourse, and shape public perception, ultimately influencing the reliability of information in the context of post-truth. The comprehensive approach in the study allows us to understand how the state controls information flows, the process of prioritization in the public consciousness and the formation of the public sphere in the context of post-truth in China. The research methodology is comprehensive, it includes: case study, data collection methods (statistical analysis and text analysis), application of theoretical foundations (theory of media ownership, theory of the public sphere, theory of agenda formation), comparative analysis. The novelty of this study is explained by the following factors: an integrated approach is applied, the research topic is relevant (a fresh look at the problem in the Chinese context), real-world case analysis, the insufficiency of the previous research base on this issue, the practical significance of the study (the conclusions of the study may be useful for politicians in China who seek to improve public confidence in the state media and make the system of state information and regulation more effective).

注释,注释: The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence has allowed humanity to witness significant changes in artificial intelligence technology in terms of capabilities and functionality, and its powerful capacity for self-learning, self-control, and evolution has gradually ushered in a new era of generalized artificial intelligence. At the same time, it also indicates that people will enter into a more complex and risky intellectual system. The gradual and widespread use of generative AI in major media communications opens up great development opportunities for the media sphere, on the one hand, and risky tasks – on the other. The subject of this research is generative artificial intelligence. The object of the research is an in-depth analysis of the risks and management trajectories of generative artificial intelligence in the main media of mass communication. This study used a comprehensive methodology based on the method of literary analysis, observation, as well as the method of forecasting and data comparison. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that the authors analyze the risks associated with generative AI in the mainstream media, namely: data privacy and security, the risk of manipulating public opinion through false information, and the problem of public trust in the media. The authors of the study propose a risk management path in terms of political leadership, regulation and technology, global cooperation and literacy, contributing to the safe, reliable and healthy development of generative AI in the mainstream media. As AI technologies are constantly being transformed, this research is quite promising and makes a scientific contribution to the general analysis and pool of research related to the use of AI in the field of media, risks, danger and ethical issues.