阅读文章 'Analysis of parties parity in the proceedings on the petition for choosing (renewal) of a measure of restriction' 警察活动 nbpublish.com
Eng Cn 翻译此页面:
请选择您的语言来翻译文章


您可以关闭窗口不翻译
图书馆
你的个人资料

Sotskov F.N. Analysis of parties parity in the proceedings on the petition for choosing (renewal) of a measure of restriction

Published in journal "Police activity", 2016-5 in rubric "- ", pages 456-461.

Resume: The research subject is the range of legal and procedural problems of choosing a measure of restriction in criminal proceedings. The author analyzes the process of choosing a measure of restriction from the position of defense. The topicality of the problem is conditioned by the practice of consideration of petitions, initiated by investigative agencies, for choosing or renewal of a measure of restriction against the accused or the suspect. It seems that this process often violates the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the rules, established by the criminal procedural law, which order to exercise the court procedure on the base of equity and the adversarial nature of the proceedings. The research methodology is based on the recent achievements in epistemology. The author applies general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional methods of jurisprudence (formal-logical) and special sociological methods (statistical, expert assessments, etc.). The author attempts at analyzing the parity of the parties to the court proceedings in choosing (renewal) of a measure of restriction. The analysis is based on the logical, empirical, formal-legal, formal-abstract and other methods of scientific cognition. In the authors opinion, his conclusions are necessary for the further study of the mentioned issue, and the suggestions are sufficient enough to amend the regulations of the criminal procedural law thus promoting trust in the judicial power.

Keywords: renewal, choosing, petition, measure, process, restriction, advocate, prosecutor, investigator, court

DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.5.17726

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Shestakova S. D. Problemy sostyazatel'nosti v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: Dis. k.yu.n. SPb., 1998. 184 s. 2. 11.08.15. Chertanovskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie ob izbranii mery presecheniya zaklyuchenie pod strazhu. Delo 90238; Nagatinskiy rayonyy sud g. Moskvy.
Preobrazhenskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie ob otkaze v udovletvorenii zayavleniya zashchitnika ob otvode sledovatelya ot uchastiya v ugolovnom protsesse. Delo 76216. 4. 27.02.15 g. Chertanovskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie o vozbuzhdenii pered sudom khodataystva ob izbranii mery presecheniya. Delo 89720.
Vasil'eva T.Yu. O neobkhodimosti sozdaniya instituta sledstvennykh sudey v ramkakh politiki gosudarstva po sovershenstvovaniyu rossiyskoy sudebnoy sistemy // Pravo i politika.-2015.-1.-C. 84-88. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.1.10870.
Shamsutdinov M.M. Reglamentatsiya mer ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya v novom UPK Respubliki Kazakhstan: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz // Pravo i politika.-2015.-6.-C. 800-808. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.6.15323.
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 3. - C. 9 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2015.3.15617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_15617.html
Sychev D.A. Prokuror v dosudebnom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Imperii // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 10. - C. 1525 - 1535. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.10.11228.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard