Sociocultural and public determination
of manipulation of subordinates
by Russian and British managers

Resume: Culture is one of the key factors that define the relations between people, and its main parameters lie in the foundation of national business culture, where industrial organizations and relations between staff members are being formed, including those between management and subordinates. At the same time, the society aims to form values and aspirations among the citizens that would be necessary for a successful adaptation within the current social and socioeconomic system. This article reviews the correspondence of social and socioeconomic values based on the example of manipulation of staff members by Russian and British management. The subject of empirical research is the manipulative tendencies of managers, their perception of themselves as manipulators, and the realization of their subordinates about the manipulative tendencies of the management. The research methods are: theoretical analysis of the scientific sources, which allow us to recreate the fundamental principles of the Russian and British cultures; evaluations and questionnaires for management and their subordinates. Based on the sociocultural specifics of Russian culture, it does not provide prerequisites for manipulation; thus the acquired results can be explained first of all by the complicated social situation within modern Russia, forcing people to elect the path of cooperation, which contradicts their sociocultural values.

Keywords: Culture, cultural parameters, national business culture, sociocultural specifics, social structure, Russian culture, British culture, people manipulation, manipulative tendencies of management, recognizing manipulations.

DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.5.12235

Unfortunately, the publishing house cannot provide access to this article, for technical reasons.

Bibliography:
Kochetkov V. V. Psikhologiya mezhkul'turnykh razlichiy. M., Izd-vo: PER SE, 2002.
Khofstede, Girt. Slovar' terminov HR, HR – glossariy http://hrm.ru/db/hrm/AB6A09FB5EF42CF2C32576A0007D1C62/glossary.html. (data obrashcheniya 20.02.2014).
Berdyaev N. Sud'ba Rossii. Izd-vo: Ast, Astrel', 2010.
Ryumshina L. I. Sotsiokul'turnye predposylki manipulirovaniya (na primere russkoy kul'tury) LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co, Germaniya, 2010.
Krys'ko V.G. Etnicheskaya psikhologiya, Uchebnoe Posobie, M., 2002.
Fillips Andrey. Ostatki pravoslavnoy traditsii v angliyskoy zhizni. http://www.pravoslavie.ru/jurnal/58579.htm. (data obrashcheniya 26.02.2014).
Maslou A. Po napravleniyu k psikhologii bytiya / Per. s angl. Rachkovoy E. M. M.,Izd – vo: EKSMO – Press, 2002.
Fromm E. Imet' ili byt'? Izd-vo: Ast, Astrel'. 2010.
Shostrom E. Anti-Karnegi, ili Chelovek-manipulyator. Minsk: TPTs «Polifakt», 1992.
Levi-Strauss S. Race and History // Structural Anthropology. Vol. 2. 1978.
Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Kul'turno-istoricheskoe ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka. M.: Smysl. 2007.
Khofstede G. Organizatsionnaya kul'tura: Upravlenie chelovecheskimi resursami. /Pod red. M.Pula, M.Uorrena. SPb: Piter, 2002.
Tkachenko S.V. Pravovaya modernizatsiya postsovetskoy Rossii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2014.-№ 5.-S.12-22. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.5.11817. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11817.html
Zaytsev A.V. Institutsionalizatsiya publichnykh debatov vo Frantsii i dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v publichnoy politike sovremennoy Rossii: sravnitel'nyy analiz // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. — 2014.-№ 5.-S.1-41. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2014.5.12120. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_12120.html
Parkhomenko R.N. Angliyskaya demokraticheskaya traditsiya XVII v. (B. Chicherin) // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2014.-№ 2.-S.163-186. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.2.11080. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_11080.html
Perov E.V. Teoriya i analiz sotsial'noy konfliktogennosti obshchestva // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. — 2013.-№ 5.-S.67-141. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.5.2308. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/nb/article_2308.html
Demetradze M.R. Sotsiokul'turnaya osnova mezhdistsiplinarnoy metodologii sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh nauk // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 12. - C. 17 - 40. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.12.10727. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_10727.html
Kuchinov A.M. Analiz sotsiokul'turnykh faktorov politiki: poiski novykh teoriy i metodov // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 2. - C. 72 - 121. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.2.412. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_412.html
Kuchinov A.M. Podkhod k analizu politicheskogo protsessa cherez ego vzaimosvyaz' s sotsiokul'turnoy dinamikoy – al'ternativa podkhodu «politicheskoy kul'tury» // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva. - 2013. - 4. - C. 43 - 52. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2013.4.5567. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_5567.html
Popov E.A. Sotsiokul'turnaya situatsiya v sovremennom rossiyskom regione i munitsipal'nom obrazovanii: sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya, natsional'no-kul'turnaya, dukhovno-konsolidiruyushchaya i etnosotsial'naya spetsifika // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 2. - C. 269 - 321. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.2.362. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_362.html
E. A. Shulepova Otechestvennaya kul'tura v ochen' slozhnyy
i plodotvornyy period // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 4. - C. 55 - 56.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard
Ryumshina L.I., Mustafaeva E.M. Sociocultural and public determination of manipulation of subordinates by Russian and British managers. // National Security / nota bene. - 2014. - № 5. - pp. 676-687. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.5.12235