注释,注释: The research subject is the range of legal and procedural problems of choosing a measure of restriction in criminal proceedings. The author analyzes the process of choosing a measure of restriction from the position of defense. The topicality of the problem is conditioned by the practice of consideration of petitions, initiated by investigative agencies, for choosing or renewal of a measure of restriction against the accused or the suspect. It seems that this process often violates the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the rules, established by the criminal procedural law, which order to exercise the court procedure on the base of equity and the adversarial nature of the proceedings. The research methodology is based on the recent achievements in epistemology. The author applies general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional methods of jurisprudence (formal-logical) and special sociological methods (statistical, expert assessments, etc.). The author attempts at analyzing the parity of the parties to the court proceedings in choosing (renewal) of a measure of restriction. The analysis is based on the logical, empirical, formal-legal, formal-abstract and other methods of scientific cognition. In the author’s opinion, his conclusions are necessary for the further study of the mentioned issue, and the suggestions are sufficient enough to amend the regulations of the criminal procedural law thus promoting trust in the judicial power. 

关键词: renewal, choosing, petition, measure, process, restriction, advocate, prosecutor, investigator, court

参考书目:
Shestakova S. D. Problemy sostyazatel'nosti v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: Dis. k.yu.n. SPb., 1998. 184 s. 2. 11.08.15. Chertanovskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie ob izbranii mery presecheniya – zaklyuchenie pod strazhu. Delo ¹ 90238; Nagatinskiy rayonyy sud g. Moskvy.
Preobrazhenskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie ob otkaze v udovletvorenii zayavleniya zashchitnika ob otvode sledovatelya ot uchastiya v ugolovnom protsesse. Delo ¹ 76216. 4. 27.02.15 g. Chertanovskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie o vozbuzhdenii pered sudom khodataystva ob izbranii mery presecheniya. Delo ¹ 89720.
Vasil'eva T.Yu. O neobkhodimosti sozdaniya instituta sledstvennykh sudey v ramkakh politiki gosudarstva po sovershenstvovaniyu rossiyskoy sudebnoy sistemy // Pravo i politika.-2015.-1.-C. 84-88. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.1.10870.
Shamsutdinov M.M. Reglamentatsiya mer ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya v novom UPK Respubliki Kazakhstan: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz // Pravo i politika.-2015.-6.-C. 800-808. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.6.15323.
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 3. - C. 9 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2015.3.15617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_15617.html
Sychev D.A. Prokuror v dosudebnom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Imperii // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 10. - C. 1525 - 1535. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.10.11228.

References (transliteration):
Shestakova S. D. Problemy sostyazatel'nosti v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: Dis. k.yu.n. SPb., 1998. 184 s. 2. 11.08.15. Chertanovskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie ob izbranii mery presecheniya – zaklyuchenie pod strazhu. Delo ¹ 90238; Nagatinskiy rayonyy sud g. Moskvy.
Preobrazhenskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie ob otkaze v udovletvorenii zayavleniya zashchitnika ob otvode sledovatelya ot uchastiya v ugolovnom protsesse. Delo ¹ 76216. 4. 27.02.15 g. Chertanovskiy rayonnyy sud g. Moskvy. Postanovlenie o vozbuzhdenii pered sudom khodataystva ob izbranii mery presecheniya. Delo ¹ 89720.
Vasil'eva T.Yu. O neobkhodimosti sozdaniya instituta sledstvennykh sudey v ramkakh politiki gosudarstva po sovershenstvovaniyu rossiyskoy sudebnoy sistemy // Pravo i politika.-2015.-1.-C. 84-88. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.1.10870.
Shamsutdinov M.M. Reglamentatsiya mer ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prinuzhdeniya v novom UPK Respubliki Kazakhstan: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz // Pravo i politika.-2015.-6.-C. 800-808. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.6.15323.
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 3. - C. 9 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2015.3.15617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_15617.html
Sychev D.A. Prokuror v dosudebnom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Imperii // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 10. - C. 1525 - 1535. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.10.11228.

注释,注释: The research subject is the legal regime of initiation of a criminal case on the base of the materials of operational investigations. The paper analyzes the provisions of the existing criminal legislation and the legislation regulating operational investigations of law enforcement agencies. The research object is the range of social relations appearing on the stage of initiation of a criminal case when analyzing the reason for initiating a preliminary investigation on the base of the data acquired in the result of operational investigations. Special attention is paid to the concept of such a reason for initiation of a criminal case as a report of an official about the elements of crime. The author applies the set of general scientific and special methods of cognition including the normative-logical method, the system method, analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction and other research methods. The novelty of the study consists in the proposals about the development of forms and methods of legal regulation of the mechanism of initiation of a criminal case on the base of the materials of operational investigations. The author concludes that the procedural peculiarities of initiation of a criminal case on the base of operational investigation results are connected with collecting various operational documents (reports, certificates, acts, copies of official documents, and other materials reflecting criminal activity of the persons under investigation) using scientific and technological instruments.  The persons involved in these documents collecting can be later interrogated as the witnesses in a criminal case. It will increase the validity of the collected evidential base and guarantee the operational information transformation into evidences and their use in criminal proceedings. The author declares the necessity to develop legal regulation of use of the materials, collected during investigational operations, in criminal proceedings.   

关键词: initiation of a criminal case, operational search activity, operational investigations, reason, ground, elements of crime, preliminary investigation, pre-investigation check, operative documenting , evidential base

参考书目:
Grigor'ev V.N. Nachalo ugolovnogo proizvodstva: sistema sderzhek i protivovesov // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2013. ¹ 2. C. 17-21.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Oniks, 2008. S. 158, 162.
Bezlepkin B.T. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). 9-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: KnoRus, 2010. S. 186.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 10.02.2009 ¹ 1 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami zhalob v poryadke st. 125 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2009. ¹ 4.
Akhmedov A.G., Strelin S.E. Sovremennye metodologicheskie problemy operativno-rozysknogo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo yuridich. instituta MVD Rossii. 2008. ¹ 1. S. 110-111.
Markushin A.G. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe ispol'zovanie rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Pravo. 2003. ¹ 2. S. 355.
Popov A.P. Neposredstvennoe obnaruzhenie priznakov prestupleniya kak povod k vozbuzhdeniyu ugolovnogo dela: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 1999. S. 116.
Astaf'ev Yu.V. Znachenie operativno-rozysknoy informatsii v ustanovlenii osnovaniy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta. Seriya: Pravo. 2008. ¹ 1. S. 274.
Vinokurov Yu.E., Glushkov A.I. K voprosu o strukture prokurorskogo nadzora kak vida gosudarstvennoy deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 30-32.
Glushkov A.I., Pugashova G.N. Problemnye voprosy prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh // Yuridicheskiy mir. 2007. ¹ 12. S. 65.
Glushkov A.I. Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov nesovershennoletnikh poterpevshikh v khode ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2012. ¹ 12. S. 51-53.
Glushkov A.I. Realizatsiya v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 67-69.
Glushkov A.I., Pleshakov A.M. O nekotorykh voprosakh organizatsii raboty politsii po profilaktike beznadzornosti i pravonarusheniy nesovershennoletnikh // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2011. ¹ 9. S. 94-95.
Glushkov A.I., Golovko N.V. Organizatsiya vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya po protivodeystviyu torgovle det'mi i ispol'zovaniyu rabskogo truda // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. ¹ 12. S. 53-56.
Golovko N.V. Dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam o torgovle nesovershennoletnimi: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. M.: MPGU. 2012. S. 45.
Golovko N.V. Osnovnye cherty kriminalisticheskoy kharakteristiki torgovli nesovershennoletnimi i ispol'zovaniya ikh rabskogo truda // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. ¹ 9. S. 2-5.
Golovko N.V. Povody i osnovanie dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela o torgovle nesovershennoletnimi i ispol'zovanii ikh rabskogo truda // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. ¹ 13. S. 24-27.
Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik dlya vuzov / A.V. Grinenko. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2013. S. 78.

References (transliteration):
Grigor'ev V.N. Nachalo ugolovnogo proizvodstva: sistema sderzhek i protivovesov // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov. 2013. ¹ 2. C. 17-21.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Oniks, 2008. S. 158, 162.
Bezlepkin B.T. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy). 9-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: KnoRus, 2010. S. 186.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 10.02.2009 ¹ 1 «O praktike rassmotreniya sudami zhalob v poryadke st. 125 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2009. ¹ 4.
Akhmedov A.G., Strelin S.E. Sovremennye metodologicheskie problemy operativno-rozysknogo preduprezhdeniya prestupleniy // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo yuridich. instituta MVD Rossii. 2008. ¹ 1. S. 110-111.
Markushin A.G. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe ispol'zovanie rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Pravo. 2003. ¹ 2. S. 355.
Popov A.P. Neposredstvennoe obnaruzhenie priznakov prestupleniya kak povod k vozbuzhdeniyu ugolovnogo dela: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 1999. S. 116.
Astaf'ev Yu.V. Znachenie operativno-rozysknoy informatsii v ustanovlenii osnovaniy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta. Seriya: Pravo. 2008. ¹ 1. S. 274.
Vinokurov Yu.E., Glushkov A.I. K voprosu o strukture prokurorskogo nadzora kak vida gosudarstvennoy deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 30-32.
Glushkov A.I., Pugashova G.N. Problemnye voprosy prekrashcheniya ugolovnogo presledovaniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnikh // Yuridicheskiy mir. 2007. ¹ 12. S. 65.
Glushkov A.I. Obespechenie prav i zakonnykh interesov nesovershennoletnikh poterpevshikh v khode ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2012. ¹ 12. S. 51-53.
Glushkov A.I. Realizatsiya v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 67-69.
Glushkov A.I., Pleshakov A.M. O nekotorykh voprosakh organizatsii raboty politsii po profilaktike beznadzornosti i pravonarusheniy nesovershennoletnikh // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2011. ¹ 9. S. 94-95.
Glushkov A.I., Golovko N.V. Organizatsiya vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya po protivodeystviyu torgovle det'mi i ispol'zovaniyu rabskogo truda // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2011. ¹ 12. S. 53-56.
Golovko N.V. Dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam o torgovle nesovershennoletnimi: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. M.: MPGU. 2012. S. 45.
Golovko N.V. Osnovnye cherty kriminalisticheskoy kharakteristiki torgovli nesovershennoletnimi i ispol'zovaniya ikh rabskogo truda // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. ¹ 9. S. 2-5.
Golovko N.V. Povody i osnovanie dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela o torgovle nesovershennoletnimi i ispol'zovanii ikh rabskogo truda // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. ¹ 13. S. 24-27.
Ugolovnyy protsess: uchebnik dlya vuzov / A.V. Grinenko. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2013. S. 78.

注释,注释: The research subject covers the patterns of the accused persons involvement in cooperation using a plea deal in the context of one of criminalistic categories – a tactical operation. A tactical operation is aimed not only at solving the tasks of identifying the circumstances serving as evidences in criminal cases of various categories, but also at reaching a compromise with the defense and involving the accused in cooperation using a plea deal. The research object comprises social relations appearing in the process of investigating and solving cases, including those appearing between the investigator and the accused and other persons involved in a tactical operation. The author applies the set of general scientific and specific methods of cognition including the normative-logical method, the system method, analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, and other research methods. The novelty of the study lies in the attempt to solve the problems connected with the formation of the system of a complex tactical provision of investigator’s activity aimed at a more rational use of the provisions about a special procedure of a plea deal establishing during criminal investigations. The author analyzes the tactical operations doctrine and outlines the structure and the content of the considered tactical operation. 

关键词: interaction, tactics , planning, tactical and forensic provision, accused, investigator, plea deal, tactical operation, preliminary investigation, involving in cooperation

参考书目:
Shikanov V.I. Teoreticheskie osnovy takticheskikh operatsiy v rassledovanii prestupleniy // Metodika rassledovaniya prestupleniy (obshchie polozheniya): materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Irkutsk, 1983.-S. 20.
Yablokov N.P., Maevskiy S. S. Obshchetakticheskie osnovy vzaimodeystviya sledovateley s zashchitnikami pri provedenii sledstvennykh deystviy v raznykh situatsiyakh / Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11, Pravo. 2010. ¹ 2. S. 34-52.
Garmaev Yu.P., Popova E.I. Primenenie sledovatelem norm ob osobom poryadke prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred'yavlennym emu obvineniem / Yu.P. Garmaev, E.I. Popova-Ulan-Ude, 2012.-S. 73.
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 3. - C. 9 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2015.3.15617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_15617.html
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. 2015. ¹ 3. S. 9-16.
Drapkin L.Ya., Dolin V.N., Pyatkova I.G. Taktika sledstvennykh deystviy: uchebnoe posobie / L.Ya. Drapkin, V.N. Dolin, I.G. Pyatkova – Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2014. – S. 10.
Dulov A.V. Takticheskie operatsii // Kriminalistika: uchebnik / A.V. Dulov-M., 2002.-S, 220.

References (transliteration):
Shikanov V.I. Teoreticheskie osnovy takticheskikh operatsiy v rassledovanii prestupleniy // Metodika rassledovaniya prestupleniy (obshchie polozheniya): materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Irkutsk, 1983.-S. 20.
Yablokov N.P., Maevskiy S. S. Obshchetakticheskie osnovy vzaimodeystviya sledovateley s zashchitnikami pri provedenii sledstvennykh deystviy v raznykh situatsiyakh / Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11, Pravo. 2010. ¹ 2. S. 34-52.
Garmaev Yu.P., Popova E.I. Primenenie sledovatelem norm ob osobom poryadke prinyatiya sudebnogo resheniya pri soglasii obvinyaemogo s pred'yavlennym emu obvineniem / Yu.P. Garmaev, E.I. Popova-Ulan-Ude, 2012.-S. 73.
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 3. - C. 9 - 16. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2015.3.15617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_15617.html
Khamidullin R.S. Nekotorye osobennosti rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del v sluchae primeneniya norm osobogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri zaklyuchenii dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. 2015. ¹ 3. S. 9-16.
Drapkin L.Ya., Dolin V.N., Pyatkova I.G. Taktika sledstvennykh deystviy: uchebnoe posobie / L.Ya. Drapkin, V.N. Dolin, I.G. Pyatkova – Ekaterinburg: Ural'skiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2014. – S. 10.
Dulov A.V. Takticheskie operatsii // Kriminalistika: uchebnik / A.V. Dulov-M., 2002.-S, 220.

注释,注释: The research subject is the range of legal and procedural problems of implementing a short-form pre-trial procedure. The author analyzes a short-form pre-trial procedure. The topicality of this issue is conditioned by the practice of implementing a short-term pre-trial procedure. The author supposes that this process violates the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Procedural Code. A short-form pre-trial procedure is provided by the regulations of the criminal procedural law prescribing to execute legal proceedings on the base of the principle of equality and competitiveness. The research methodology comprises the modern achievements of epistemology. The author applies general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, and modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logical), and the methods of specific sociological studies (statistical, expert assessments, etc.). The author concludes that at present, in order to improve the procedural provision of pre-trial restrictions. The author attempts to analyze the parity of sides in the process of considering the petition for the preventive measure. The analysis is based on the logical, empirical, technical, formal-abstract and other methods of scientific cognition. The author formulates the conclusions which are necessary for the further study of this issue. The author’s suggestions are suitable for amending the provisions of the criminal procedural law regulating this form of relations, thus promoting the formation of confidence in the institution of a short-form pre-trial procedure. 

参考书目:
O vnesenii izmeneniy v ugolovno – protsessual'nyy kodeks RSFSR: ukaz Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR ot 24 yanvarya 1985 g. // Ved. Verkh. Soveta RSFSR. – 1985.-¹5. st. 163.
Chuvilev A.A.. Podsledstvennost' ugolovnykh del // Zakonnost'. – 1996.-¹7. – S.29.
Bagautdinov F.N., Mukhamedzyanov I.S. Protokol'naya forma sudebnoy podgotovki materialov // Zakonnost'. – 2000. – «8. – S. 21-24; Vlasova N.A. Doznanie i uproshchennoe proizvodstvo :vremya reform // Yurid. konsul'tant. – 2000.-¹5. – S. 4-6: Gavrilov B.Ya. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii.
Gir'ko S.I. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii militsii : monografiya. – M : VNII MVD Rossii, 2003. – S. 54.
Gavrilov B. Ya. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii : tsifry i fakty : monografiya. M., Prospekt. 2008. – S.152.
Glushchenko O.P. Razvitie ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva o privlechenii ponyatykh dlya uchastiya v sledstvennykh deystviyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 6. - C. 787 - 792. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.6.15593.

References (transliteration):
O vnesenii izmeneniy v ugolovno – protsessual'nyy kodeks RSFSR: ukaz Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Soveta RSFSR ot 24 yanvarya 1985 g. // Ved. Verkh. Soveta RSFSR. – 1985.-¹5. st. 163.
Chuvilev A.A.. Podsledstvennost' ugolovnykh del // Zakonnost'. – 1996.-¹7. – S.29.
Bagautdinov F.N., Mukhamedzyanov I.S. Protokol'naya forma sudebnoy podgotovki materialov // Zakonnost'. – 2000. – «8. – S. 21-24; Vlasova N.A. Doznanie i uproshchennoe proizvodstvo :vremya reform // Yurid. konsul'tant. – 2000.-¹5. – S. 4-6: Gavrilov B.Ya. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii.
Gir'ko S.I. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii militsii : monografiya. – M : VNII MVD Rossii, 2003. – S. 54.
Gavrilov B. Ya. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii : tsifry i fakty : monografiya. M., Prospekt. 2008. – S.152.
Glushchenko O.P. Razvitie ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva o privlechenii ponyatykh dlya uchastiya v sledstvennykh deystviyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2015. - 6. - C. 787 - 792. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2015.6.15593.

注释,注释: The article focuses on the problems of legal regulation of the parties’ statuses in the procedural relations. The importance of this topic is conditioned by the legislative rights of the state prosecution and the defense to present their opinions to the court on the stage of pleadings about the application of the criminal law and infliction of punishment. The main conclusion of the article says that the abovementioned legal specificity is supposed to have an ambiguous legal regulation and, consequently, is unequally considered by the court when deciding on the case. This circumstance predetermines the search for the solution of the problem of the parties’ equality during the proceedings and the priority of one of the opinions for the court. The methodology of the research is based on the recent achievements of epistemology. The author uses the theoretical and general philosophical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical) and the methods applied in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert assessments, etc.). The main conclusion of the article says that there is still much to be done for the provision of law and order in criminal procedure. The main conclusion of the author is the declaration of the necessity of the parties’ procedural equality development in criminal proceedings. The novelty of the research lies in the proposals about the development of procedural criminal legislation in the sphere of the provision of procedural equality of parties in the stage of pleadings.

关键词: public prosecution, court, police, duty, party, equality, lawyer, coercion, process, stage

参考书目:
Alekseev N.S., Makarova Z.V. Oratorskoe iskusstvo v sude. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1985;
Danilevich A.A. Osnovy teorii i professional'noy kul'tury sudebnykh preniy: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1983;
Ostapchuk N.N. Voprosy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy rechi v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovskiy yurid. in-t, 1980;
Pobegaylo G.D. Sudebnye preniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse: obshchie polozheniya. M.: VYuZI, 1982;
Perlov I.D. Sudebnye preniya i poslednee slovo podsudimogo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1957;
Efremova T.F. Sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. V 3 tomakh. AST, Astrel', Kharvest. 2005.
Vol'kenshteyn F.A., Bobrishchev-Pushkin A.V. Preniya storon v ugolovnom protsesse. SPb.: Tipografiya tovarishchestva "Trud", 1903.
Koni A.F. Zaklyuchitel'nye preniya storon v ugolovnom protsesse // Sobr. soch. v 8 tomakh. T.
M.: Yurid. lit., 1967. 4. Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1960; Sergeich P. Ugolovnaya zashchita. M.: Yurayt, 2008;
Ivakina N.N. Osnovy sudebnogo krasnorechiya (ritorika dlya yuristov). M., 2002.
– Porokhovshchikov P.S. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. Tula. Avtograf, 2000. Vosproizvoditsya po izdaniyu 1910 g.
Pashin S. A. Psikhologiya sudebnykh preniy. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. ¹ 1. S. 15 – 18.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «administrativnyy protsess» i «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 179 - 190. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11172.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Administrativnye pravootnosheniya i ikh realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti politsii pri primenenii mer presecheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 2. - C. 141 - 157. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.10640.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess
i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.

References (transliteration):
Alekseev N.S., Makarova Z.V. Oratorskoe iskusstvo v sude. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1985;
Danilevich A.A. Osnovy teorii i professional'noy kul'tury sudebnykh preniy: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1983;
Ostapchuk N.N. Voprosy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy rechi v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovskiy yurid. in-t, 1980;
Pobegaylo G.D. Sudebnye preniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse: obshchie polozheniya. M.: VYuZI, 1982;
Perlov I.D. Sudebnye preniya i poslednee slovo podsudimogo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1957;
Efremova T.F. Sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. V 3 tomakh. AST, Astrel', Kharvest. 2005.
Vol'kenshteyn F.A., Bobrishchev-Pushkin A.V. Preniya storon v ugolovnom protsesse. SPb.: Tipografiya tovarishchestva "Trud", 1903.
Koni A.F. Zaklyuchitel'nye preniya storon v ugolovnom protsesse // Sobr. soch. v 8 tomakh. T.
M.: Yurid. lit., 1967. 4. Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1960; Sergeich P. Ugolovnaya zashchita. M.: Yurayt, 2008;
Ivakina N.N. Osnovy sudebnogo krasnorechiya (ritorika dlya yuristov). M., 2002.
– Porokhovshchikov P.S. Iskusstvo rechi na sude. Tula. Avtograf, 2000. Vosproizvoditsya po izdaniyu 1910 g.
Pashin S. A. Psikhologiya sudebnykh preniy. Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. ¹ 1. S. 15 – 18.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V. Administrativnyy protsess i ego realizatsii v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 1 - 44. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2013.4.9250. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_9250.html
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Obydenov V.V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «administrativnyy protsess» i «administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya» v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2014. - 2. - C. 179 - 190. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2014.2.11172.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Kareeva-Popelkovskaya K.A. Administrativnye pravootnosheniya i ikh realizatsiya v deyatel'nosti politsii pri primenenii mer presecheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 2. - C. 141 - 157. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.10640.
Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. Administrativnyy protsess
i ego realizatsiya
v deyatel'nosti politsii // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 3. - C. 155 - 170. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.3.8995.

注释,注释: The subject of the article includes the problems of civil action realization in criminal procedure. The object of the article includes the social relations appearing in the process of combination of criminal and civil procedures. The urgency of the issue consists in the ambiguity of legal practice, complicated by civil action in criminal procedure, which is rich in legislative gaps of combination of criminal and civil procedures in the sphere of protection of defendants' rights from claims. The author pays special attention to the fact that in practice the questions arise about the impact of civil claim in criminal proceedings on court decision in determining the punishment in case of conviction of a crime constituting the basis for the complaint.The methodology of the research is based on the modern achievements of epistemology. The author uses the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (the formal-logical method), and the methods used in the sociological research (statistics, expert opinions, etc.).The author makes an attempt to provide the suggestions about the enhancement of procedural legislation in the sphere of civil action in criminal procedure by means of the logical and the empirical methods. The author comes to the conclusion about the necessity to abolish civil action in criminal proceedings.

关键词: practice, action, procedure, citizen, legal procedure, protection, guarding, enforcement, judicial, court

参考书目:
Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Otv. red. P.A. Lupinskaya P.A. – M., 2010. S. 1072
Ugolovnyy protsess / Otv. red. A.V. Grinenko. – M., 2009. – S. 80.
Arkhiv Chertanovskogo rayonnogo suda g. Moskvy za 2013 g. Delo ¹ 1-597/13
Arkhiv Nagatinskogo rayonnogo suda g. Moskvy za 2014 g. Delo ¹ 1-510/14
Arkhiv Nagatinskogo rayonnogo suda za 2015 g. Delo ¹ 1-5/15
Arkhiv Nagatinskogo rayonnogo suda za 2012 g. Delo ¹ 1-380/12
Arkhiv sudebnogo uchastka mirovogo sud'i ¹ 32 rayona «Nagatinskiy» g. Moskvy v YuAO. Delo ¹ 1-05/14
Sokolov T.V. Vzaimosvyaz' konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstv: sovremennoe sostoyanie // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1350 - 1372. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9496.
Koss A.V., Gerasimova E.V. Problemy razumnosti sroka ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na stadii proizvodstva vvidu novykh ili vnov' otkryvshikhsya obstoyatel'stv v svete resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1896 - 1902. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.12.13260.
Nikolaeva A.A. Aktual'nye problemy ispol'zovaniya izobrazheniya grazhdan v protsesse tvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1709 - 1717. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.11.13130.
Toropov A.V. Iskovaya forma v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve: novoe v zakonodatel'stve. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 360 - 366. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11508.

References (transliteration):
Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Otv. red. P.A. Lupinskaya P.A. – M., 2010. S. 1072
Ugolovnyy protsess / Otv. red. A.V. Grinenko. – M., 2009. – S. 80.
Arkhiv Chertanovskogo rayonnogo suda g. Moskvy za 2013 g. Delo ¹ 1-597/13
Arkhiv Nagatinskogo rayonnogo suda g. Moskvy za 2014 g. Delo ¹ 1-510/14
Arkhiv Nagatinskogo rayonnogo suda za 2015 g. Delo ¹ 1-5/15
Arkhiv Nagatinskogo rayonnogo suda za 2012 g. Delo ¹ 1-380/12
Arkhiv sudebnogo uchastka mirovogo sud'i ¹ 32 rayona «Nagatinskiy» g. Moskvy v YuAO. Delo ¹ 1-05/14
Sokolov T.V. Vzaimosvyaz' konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstv: sovremennoe sostoyanie // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 10. - C. 1350 - 1372. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9496.
Koss A.V., Gerasimova E.V. Problemy razumnosti sroka ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva na stadii proizvodstva vvidu novykh ili vnov' otkryvshikhsya obstoyatel'stv v svete resheniy Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 12. - C. 1896 - 1902. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.12.13260.
Nikolaeva A.A. Aktual'nye problemy ispol'zovaniya izobrazheniya grazhdan v protsesse tvorcheskoy deyatel'nosti // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1709 - 1717. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.11.13130.
Toropov A.V. Iskovaya forma v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve: novoe v zakonodatel'stve. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 360 - 366. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.4.11508.

注释,注释: It is noted in the article that qualification of a crime is establishing correspondence between the elements of crime committed and the elements of certain crime established by the relevant article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Being a constituent element of the activities of competent officials, and in some cases, the judges, on application of criminal law, qualification is a thinking process of the official, including comparison of elements of an act committed and the elements within a certain crime established by law. Based upon the above, the author makes a conclusion that the result of this comparison is legal evaluation of the act committed. Based upon this methodological basis, the author forms the object of studies regarding multiple crimes. The methodological basis for the article was formed with the modern achievements of the cognition theory. In the process of studies the author used general philosophical, theoretical and empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods ( formal logic method), and methods typical for specific sociological studies (statistical, expert evaluation, etc.). It is established in the article that a number of issues regarding qualification of multiple crimes concerns evaluation of criminal activity of a guilty person as process developing in time and space. That is why resolution of the problem is not directly provided for by the law, however, it follows from the existing practice of its application. Two situations are possible here, both theoretically and practically.

关键词: crime, punishment, qualifi cation, multiplicity, sanction, criminal, law, judge, court, problem.

联络资料: Dosaeva, Glera Suleymanovna, 344038, Russia, Rostov-na-Donu, pr. Lenina, 44.

参考书目:
Blagov E.V. Kvalifikatsiya pri sovershenii prestupleniya. M., 2009.
Kozlov A.P. Edinichnye prestupleniya: ponyatie, klassifikatsiya, kvalifikatsiya. Krasnoyarsk, 2007.
Romanyuk S.N. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya: Avtoref dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2008.
Chikin D.S. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya (ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika, problemy kvalifikatsii i zakonodatel'nogo konstruirovaniya): Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2013.
A. A. Engel'gardt Osnovaniya primeneniya norm
ob ideal'noy sovokupnosti prestupleniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 282 - 287.
Suleymanova S.T. Ponyatie i tseli nakazaniya
po ugolovnomu pravu Kanady // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 466 - 473.
Bukalerova L.A., Fortuna K.A. K voprosu o nakazaniyakh za korruptsionnye sluzhebnye podlogi // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 17 - 25.

References (transliteration):
Blagov E.V. Kvalifikatsiya pri sovershenii prestupleniya. M., 2009.
Kozlov A.P. Edinichnye prestupleniya: ponyatie, klassifikatsiya, kvalifikatsiya. Krasnoyarsk, 2007.
Romanyuk S.N. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya: Avtoref dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2008.
Chikin D.S. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya (ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika, problemy kvalifikatsii i zakonodatel'nogo konstruirovaniya): Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2013.
A. A. Engel'gardt Osnovaniya primeneniya norm
ob ideal'noy sovokupnosti prestupleniy // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 2. - C. 282 - 287.
Suleymanova S.T. Ponyatie i tseli nakazaniya
po ugolovnomu pravu Kanady // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. - 2013. - 3. - C. 466 - 473.
Bukalerova L.A., Fortuna K.A. K voprosu o nakazaniyakh za korruptsionnye sluzhebnye podlogi // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 17 - 25.